Download Proposal

Download Proposal

11th Integrated Rating Methodology

Background

Since 2012, Integrated Rating Exercise has been executed annually under the aegis of Ministry of Power (MoP) with the aim of evaluating performance of power distribution utilities. With the current report, the Ministry is publishing the results and insights from the 11th edition of this annual exercise, conducted with the Power Finance Corporation as the nodal agency.

The framework adopted for the Rating Exercise is approved by MoP and has evolved over the years to reflect the changes in the power sector and national priorities. The rating framework underwent a significant overhaul during the 10th Integrated Rating Exercise – with focus on capturing the true financial picture (financial metrics on cash-basis instead of accrual basis), vital role of external environment (state government, state regulator), conformity to best sectoral practices (captured as negative scoring of Specific Disincentive metrices)

The 11th Integrated Rating continues the same rating framework used the year before – with the objective of capturing the performance changes on the same methodology. The framework consists of 15 base rating metrics and 9 disincentives, which together provide a score out of 100—to holistically capture a discom’s performance. Based on the integrated rating score and overriding conditions, discoms are being assigned specific grades (A+, A, B, B-, C, C- and D).

As part of the 11th Integrated Ratings, data has been collected and ratings published for 57 discoms (both state owned and private) and 12 power departments.

11th Integrated Rating Framework for State & Private Power Distribution Utilities

11th Integrated Rating Framework for Power Departments

Grading System in the 11th Integrated Rating

Score

Integrated Rating Score derived basis performance on 15 base rating metrics and 9 specific disincentives as per the 10th Rating Framework

Rank

Rank of the DISCOM is based on the Integrated Rating Score. Newly formed DISCOMs are not included in the Ranking

Grade

5 Grades allotted basis Rating Score

Grade

Rating

Additional overriding ACS-ARR gap condition

A+

Greater than or equal to 85

Should be in surplus (Gap should be less than or equal to 0 paisa/kWh i.e., surplus)

A

Greater than or equal to 65 and less than 85

ACS-ARR Gap should be less than or equal to 15 paisa/kWh

B

Greater than or equal to 50 and less than 65

ACS-ARR Gap should be less than or
equal to 50 paisa/kWh

B-

Greater than or equal to 35 and less than 50

ACS-ARR Gap should be less than
Rs. 1.0/kWh

C

Greater than or equal to 15 and less than 35

ACS-ARR Gap should be less than
Rs. 1.25/kWh

C-

Less than 15

D

Utilities under SMA-2

Score Trajectory

3 types basis trend in Integrated Score

Trajectory

Definition

Improving

Score of current year is increased by more than 5% than previous year

Stable

Score increased / decreased by less than 5% than previous year

Declining

Score of current year is decreased by more than 5% than previous year

To view a detailed report on the 11th Integrated Ratings, please click below.

Copyright © Urja DRISHTI. All Rights Reserved.